Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

News & Analysis Policies & Forms Your Library Attorney Network
News & Analysis Policies & Forms Your Library Attorney Network

User account menu

Sign in Get Started
x

You're signed out

Sign in to access subscriber actions.

In Title VII retaliation cases, no knowledge means no claim

March 2025 employment law letter
Authors: 

Michael P. Maslanka, UNT-Dallas College of Law

The U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals (which covers all Texas employers) just gave us an important reminder about how to defeat the increasingly popular claim of retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 .

Opposition

Kelly Dietrich worked for UPS in a variety of positions, including as a delivery vehicle package pre-loader.

Dietrich complained to manager Mike Lentz about sexual harassment in the workplace. She later filed a discrimination charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) over her claim. Her conduct clearly falls within the category of opposing unlawful discrimination.

Alleged retaliation

Later, Dietrich won a competitive bid to participate in a delivery vehicle driver training program. Her trainer was James Shipp, who determined she flunked out of the program.

Shipp informed his boss, Paul Phillips, who, in turn, delivered the news to Dietrich. She alleged she responded by telling Phillips that Lentz told him she “could not pass the program.”

Continue reading your article with a HRLaws membership
  • Sign in
  • Sign up
Upgrade to a subscription now
to get unlimited access to everything on HR Laws.
Start subscription
Any time

Publications

  • Employment Law Letter
  • Employers State Law Alert
  • Federal Employment Law Insider

Your Library Reading List

Reading list 6
Creating List 7
Testing

Let's manage your states

We'll keep you updated on state changes

Manage States
© 2025
BLR®, A DIVISION OF SIMPLIFY COMPLIANCE LLC | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Footer - Copyright

  • terms
  • legal
  • privacy