Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

News & Analysis Policies & Forms Your Library Attorney Network
News & Analysis Policies & Forms Your Library Attorney Network

User account menu

Sign in Get Started
x

You're signed out

Sign in to access subscriber actions.

Takes two to tango: Employees must participate in the interactive process

June 2020 employment law letter
Authors: 
Latiqua M. Liles, Genova Burns LLC

On March 31, the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals (whose rulings apply to all New Jersey employers) affirmed the district court’s dismissal of discrimination, retaliation, and wrongful termination claims filed by an ex-accountant of a local board of health. The employee filed claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as well as a common law claim for wrongful termination, but the appeals court found no discrimination or retaliation occurred and the wrongful termination claim was based on the same facts as the discrimination and retaliation claims.

Facts

B. Janet Petti worked as an accountant for the Ocean County Health Department (OCHD) starting in 2004. In November 2012, construction commenced on the OCHD campus at the building next to where Petti worked. On multiple occasions, she expressed concerns to OCHD staff that construction debris containing asbestos would get into her building and upset an unidentified medical condition she had.

Continue reading your article with a HRLaws membership
  • Sign in
  • Sign up
Upgrade to a subscription now
to get unlimited access to everything on HR Laws.
Start subscription
Any time

Publications

  • Employment Law Letter
  • Employers State Law Alert
  • Federal Employment Law Insider

Your Library Reading List

Reading list 6
Creating List 7
Testing

Let's manage your states

We'll keep you updated on state changes

Manage States
© 2025
BLR®, A DIVISION OF SIMPLIFY COMPLIANCE LLC | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Footer - Copyright

  • terms
  • legal
  • privacy