Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

News & Analysis Policies & Forms Your Library Attorney Network
News & Analysis Policies & Forms Your Library Attorney Network

User account menu

Sign in Get Started
x

You're signed out

Sign in to access subscriber actions.

Supreme Court bans employment bias against gay and transgender people

July 2020 employment law letter
Authors: 
Mark G. Jeffries and Alyssa L. Lazar, Steptoe & Johnson PLLC

Employment discrimination against individuals because of their gay or transgender status necessarily entails discrimination based on sex and therefore is unlawful under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the U.S. Supreme Court decided on June 15, 2020. The 6-3 ruling resolved disagreements among the circuit courts about the scope of Title VII’s protections for sexual orientation and gender identity. As Justice Neil Gorsuch, who delivered the Court’s opinion, stated: “At bottom, these cases involve no more than the straightforward application of legal terms with plain and settled meanings.”

‘Intentionally treats a person worse because of sex’

The Supreme Court expanded protections against workplace discrimination, concluding bias based on homosexuality or transgender status constitutes discrimination on the basis of one’s sex. Accordingly, the Court held an employer that intentionally treats a person worse because of sex—such as by firing the individual for actions or attributes it would tolerate in someone of another sex—discriminates against that person in violation of Title VII.

In the opinion, Justice Gorsuch strictly construed Title VII’s command that it’s “unlawful . . . for an employer to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.” Justice Gorsuch interpreted the statute in accordance with the meaning of the terms at the time of its enactment in 1964.

Continue reading your article with a HRLaws membership
  • Sign in
  • Sign up
Upgrade to a subscription now
to get unlimited access to everything on HR Laws.
Start subscription
Any time

Publications

  • Employment Law Letter
  • Employers State Law Alert
  • Federal Employment Law Insider

Your Library Reading List

Reading list 6
Creating List 7
Testing

Let's manage your states

We'll keep you updated on state changes

Manage States
© 2025
BLR®, A DIVISION OF SIMPLIFY COMPLIANCE LLC | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Footer - Copyright

  • terms
  • legal
  • privacy