Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

News & Analysis Policies & Forms Your Library Attorney Network
News & Analysis Policies & Forms Your Library Attorney Network

User account menu

Sign in Get Started
x

You're signed out

Sign in to access subscriber actions.

First on the chopping block: When cursing out the boss loses its protection

November 2026 employment law letter
Authors: 

Leah Trahan, Parsons Behle & Latimer

In September, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) added another chapter to a long-running tug-of-war: When can an employer discipline a worker who blows up at management (sometimes with profanity) while also engaging in “concerted activity” (e.g., employees banding together to raise concerns about pay, safety, or working conditions)?

NLRB back-and-forth

In Lion Elastomers, the employer claimed it didn’t terminate the employee for concerted activity (the employee was a long-term and active union member) but instead because he was hostile and attempting to create an intimidating environment both during and after a safety meeting.

In 2020, the NLRB first sided with the employee, ruling the firing broke the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). To get there, the NLRB used a “context-specific” test, weighing factors like where the outburst happened, what it was about, how extreme it was, and whether the employer provoked it. 

Continue reading your article with a HRLaws membership
  • Sign in
  • Sign up
Upgrade to a subscription now
to get unlimited access to everything on HR Laws.
Start subscription
Any time

Publications

  • Employment Law Letter
  • Employers State Law Alert
  • Federal Employment Law Insider

Your Library Reading List

Reading list 6
Creating List 7
Testing

Let's manage your states

We'll keep you updated on state changes

Manage States
© 2026
BLR®, A DIVISION OF SIMPLIFY COMPLIANCE LLC | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Footer - Copyright

  • terms
  • legal
  • privacy