Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

News & Analysis Policies & Forms Your Library Attorney Network
News & Analysis Policies & Forms Your Library Attorney Network

User account menu

Sign in Get Started
x

You're signed out

Sign in to access subscriber actions.

Before firing an employee who refuses to travel, ‘go slow’

August 2020 employment law letter
Authors: 
Brad Cave, Holland & Hart LLP

Q         We have workers who must travel as an essential part of their jobs. Some are refusing to travel. We want a policy on what to do with such refusal to avoid any risk to the company. Is it safe to terminate employees if they won’t travel, we have no other work for them, and there’s no Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) issue?

A   Ultimately, yes, you may be able to legally terminate employees who refuse to do a part of their job. Before making that decision, you should consider whether their refusal to travel is protected activity under Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) regulations. The regulations recognize that employees may have a right to refuse to work due to safety concerns under some circumstances. If you terminate an employee for refusing to work, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) can issue a citation against you and require reinstatement of the employee based on evidence that she:

Continue reading your article with a HRLaws membership
  • Sign in
  • Sign up
Upgrade to a subscription now
to get unlimited access to everything on HR Laws.
Start subscription
Any time

Publications

  • Employment Law Letter
  • Employers State Law Alert
  • Federal Employment Law Insider

Your Library Reading List

Reading list 6
Creating List 7
Testing

Let's manage your states

We'll keep you updated on state changes

Manage States
© 2025
BLR®, A DIVISION OF SIMPLIFY COMPLIANCE LLC | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Footer - Copyright

  • terms
  • legal
  • privacy