Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

News & Analysis Policies & Forms Your Library Attorney Network
News & Analysis Policies & Forms Your Library Attorney Network

User account menu

Sign in Get Started
x

You're signed out

Sign in to access subscriber actions.

Fired administrator's USERRA claims rejected because of insufficient evidence

February 2020 employment law letter
Authors: 
Bonnie M. Boryca and Chelsey L. Gilinsky, Erickson | Sederstrom, P.C.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit recently affirmed a ruling by the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska in a case brought by a military veteran against his former employer under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA). The veteran accused his employer of discriminating and retaliating against him because of his service in the military and his attempt to exercise certain statutory rights.

Facts of the case

David McConnell began serving on active duty in the U.S. Army in 1999 and retired in 2008. Before his retirement, he sustained two long-term disabilities: (1) posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and (2) a back injury that prevented him from lifting more than 40 pounds.

In November 2012—four years after he retired from the Army—McConnell interviewed for a service center manager job at Anixter, Inc.'s facility in Grand Island, Nebraska. When he informed the hiring supervisor of his service-related disabilities, he was assured the company would have no problem accommodating them. The hiring supervisor told him the company viewed his military experience positively because he would need the skill set he had gained through his service to perform the supervisory position.

McConnell was hired for the manager position and began directly supervising several employees. During his time at Anixter, he was involved in two separate incidents that led to discipline. The first occurred in May 2013 when he made a vulgar remark to a subordinate. His supervisor issued him an oral warning admonishing him about using such language toward subordinates.

Continue reading your article with a HRLaws membership
  • Sign in
  • Sign up
Upgrade to a subscription now
to get unlimited access to everything on HR Laws.
Start subscription
Any time

Publications

  • Employment Law Letter
  • Employers State Law Alert
  • Federal Employment Law Insider

Your Library Reading List

Reading list 6
Creating List 7
Testing

Let's manage your states

We'll keep you updated on state changes

Manage States
© 2025
BLR®, A DIVISION OF SIMPLIFY COMPLIANCE LLC | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Footer - Copyright

  • terms
  • legal
  • privacy