Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

News & Analysis Policies & Forms Your Library Attorney Network
News & Analysis Policies & Forms Your Library Attorney Network

User account menu

Sign in Get Started
x

You're signed out

Sign in to access subscriber actions.

Allegations of rude, dismissive treatment not enough to support harassment claim

June 2021 employment law letter
Authors: 
Jennifer Kogos, Jones Walker LLP

The U.S. Supreme Court's Bostock decision extended the protections against discrimination and harassment under Title VII to gay and transgender persons. The landmark 2020 ruling, however, in no way lowered the legal standard required to prove sexual harassment, the 5th Circuit recently decided. The ruling makes clear that simple rude treatment, without more, isn't enough to establish a Title VII violation.

Experienced female police officer unimpressed with female rookie

Windcrest Police Department hired Brandy Newbury in March 2016. As a new officer, she was in a probationary period during her first year of work. Probationary officers work with and receive training from a field training officer (FTO) for about 14 weeks. In addition to working with her FTO, Newbury worked closely with Officer Blanca Jaime. The two women did not hit it off:

Continue reading your article with a HRLaws membership
  • Sign in
  • Sign up
Upgrade to a subscription now
to get unlimited access to everything on HR Laws.
Start subscription
Any time

Publications

  • Employment Law Letter
  • Employers State Law Alert
  • Federal Employment Law Insider

Your Library Reading List

Reading list 6
Creating List 7
Testing

Let's manage your states

We'll keep you updated on state changes

Manage States
© 2025
BLR®, A DIVISION OF SIMPLIFY COMPLIANCE LLC | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Footer - Copyright

  • terms
  • legal
  • privacy